Policy Tracker

Automated decision systems.

CA · Legislation · 2025 · AB1018

Legislation
Engrossed

Record updated Sep 13, 2025

Summary

An act to add Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, to amend Section 51 of the Civil Code, and to add Article 3 (commencing with Section 12959) to Chapter 6 of Part 2.8 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating to artificial intelligence.

Timeline

2025-09-13

S

Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Wiener.

2025-09-08

S

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

2025-09-05

S

Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

2025-08-29

S

From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).

2025-08-29

S

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

2025-08-18

S

In committee: Referred to suspense file.

2025-07-17

S

Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

2025-07-16

S

From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 15).

Bill Text

Rendered HTML Filing

Official document markup is preserved and restyled to match the active site theme.


Amended  IN  Senate  September 05, 2025
Amended  IN  Senate  July 17, 2025
Amended  IN  Senate  July 03, 2025
Amended  IN  Assembly  May 01, 2025
Amended  IN  Assembly  April 10, 2025

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 1018


Introduced by Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Bryan, Ortega, and Ward)
(Coauthor: Senator Padilla)

February 20, 2025


An act to add Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, to amend Section 51 of the Civil Code, and to add Article 3 (commencing with Section 12959) to Chapter 6 of Part 2.8 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating to artificial intelligence.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1018, as amended, Bauer-Kahan. Automated decision systems.
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act establishes the Civil Rights Department within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency and requires the department to, among other things, bring civil actions to enforce the act.
Existing law requires, on or before September 1, 2024, the Department of Technology to conduct, in coordination with other interagency bodies as it deems appropriate, a comprehensive inventory of all high-risk automated decision systems that have been proposed for use, development, or procurement by, or are being used, developed, or procured by, any state agency.
This bill would generally regulate the development and deployment of an automated decision system (ADS) used to make consequential decisions, as defined. The bill would define “automated decision system” to mean a computational process derived from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or artificial intelligence that issues simplified output, including a score, classification, or recommendation, that is designed or used to assist or replace human discretionary decisionmaking and materially impacts natural persons.
This bill would require a developer of a covered ADS, as defined, to take certain actions, including conduct performance evaluations impact assessments of the covered ADS and provide deployers to whom the developer transfers the covered ADS with certain information, including a high-level summary of the results of those performance evaluations. impact assessments.
This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, require a deployer of a covered ADS to take certain actions, including provide certain disclosures to a subject of a consequential decision made or facilitated by the covered ADS and provide the subject with an opportunity to appeal the outcome of the consequential decision, as prescribed.
This bill would require a developer, deployer, or auditor to, within 30 days of receiving a request from the Attorney General, provide an unredacted copy of the performance evaluation impact assessment prepared pursuant to the bill to the Attorney General and would exempt those records from the California Public Records Act.
This bill would authorize certain public entities, including the Attorney General, to bring a specified civil action for noncompliance.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) is added to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, to read:
CHAPTER  24.6. Automated Decisions Safety Act

22756.
 As used in this chapter:
(a) “Artificial intelligence” means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments.
(b) (1) “Automated decision system” means a computational process derived from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics, or artificial intelligence that issues simplified output, including a score, classification, or recommendation, that is designed or used to assist or replace human discretionary decisionmaking and materially impacts natural persons.
(2) “Automated decision system” does not mean include a spam email filter, firewall, antivirus software, identity and verification or access management tool, calculator, database, dataset, spreadsheet, document validation or authenticity tool, or other compilation of data. data or information.
(c) “Consequential decision” means a decision that materially impacts the cost, terms, quality, or accessibility of any of the following to a natural person:
(1) Employment-related decisions.
(2) Education and vocational training as they relate to any of the following:
(A) Assessment and placement.
(B) Detecting student cheating and plagiarism.
(C) Accreditation.
(D) Certification.
(E) Admissions and enrollment.
(F) Discipline.
(G) Evaluation.
(H) Financial aid and scholarships.
(I) Proctoring.
(3) Housing and lodging as they relate to any of the following:
(A) Rental or short-term housing and lodging.
(B) Home appraisals.
(C) Rental subsidies.
(D) Publicly supported housing.
(4) Any of the following essential utilities:
(A) Electricity.
(B) Heat.
(C) Water.
(D) Transportation.
(E) Municipal trash and sewage services.
(5) Family planning, adoption services, reproductive services, and assessments related to child protective services.
(6) Health care and health insurance, including mental health care, dental, and vision.
(7) Financial services, including a financial service provided by a mortgage company, mortgage broker, or creditor.
(8) The criminal justice system with respect to pretrial release, sentencing, and alternatives to incarceration.
(9) Legal services.
(10) Private arbitration.
(11) Mediation.
(12) Elections as they relate to any of the following:
(A) Voting.
(B) Redistricting.
(C) Voter eligibility and registration.
(D) Distribution of voting information.
(E) Election administration.
(13) Access to government benefits or services or assignment of penalties by a government entity.
(14) Places of public accommodation, as defined in Section 55.52 of the Civil Code.
(15) Insurance.
(16) Internet and telecommunications access.
(d) (1) “Covered automated decision system” or “covered ADS” means an automated decision system that is designed or used to for, or used by, a deployer to profile a natural person in order for the deployer to make or facilitate a consequential decision.
(2) “Covered ADS” does not mean a GenAI system that is not intended or advertised to make or facilitate a consequential decision.
(e) “Credit score” means a credit score, as defined in Section 1785.15.1 of the Civil Code, from a consumer credit reporting agency, as defined in Section 1785.3 of the Civil Code.
(f) “Deployer” means a person, partnership, state or local government agency, corporation, or developer that uses a covered ADS to make or facilitate a consequential decision, either directly or by contracting with a third party for that purpose.
(g) “Developer” means a person, partnership, state or local government agency, corporation, or deployer that designs, codes, substantially modifies, or otherwise produces an automated decision system that makes or facilitates a consequential decision, either directly or by contracting with a third party for those purposes. decision.
(h) (1) “Developer-approved use” means a deployment context in which a developer intends a covered ADS to make or facilitate a consequential decision.
(2) “Developer-approved use” includes any reasonably foreseeable fine tuning fine-tuning of the covered ADS.
(i) “Disparate impact” means a differential effect on a group of individuals who share a protected characteristic.
(j) “Disparate treatment” means differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a protected characteristic.
(k) “Employment-related decision” means a decision made by an employer, either directly or through a third party, that affects wages, benefits, other compensation, hours, work schedule, performance evaluation, hiring, discipline, promotion, termination, job tasks and responsibilities, assignment of work, access to work and training opportunities, productivity requirements, workplace health and safety, or other terms or conditions of employment.
(l) (1) “Express consent” means an affirmative written authorization that is granted in response to a notice that is all both of the following:
(A) Clear, meaningful, and prominent.
(B) Conveyed in a manner that a natural person would notice and understand it.

(C)Not contained within a more general notice, agreement, or set of terms and conditions.

(2) “Express consent” does not mean include an authorization that is either any of the following:
(A) Inferred from inaction.
(B) Obtained through the use of a dark pattern, as defined in Section 56.18 of the Civil Code.
(C) Contained within a more general notice, agreement, or set of terms and conditions.
(m) “Fine-tune” means to adjust the model parameters of an automated decision system through exposure to additional data.
(n) “GenAI system” means an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio, that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system’s training data.

(n)

(o) “Labor Commissioner” means Chief of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.

(o)

(p) “Personal information” has the same meaning as defined in Section 1798.140 of the Civil Code.
(q) “Profile” means to use a covered ADS that does both of the following:
(1) Receives, as input data, the personal information of a subject of the consequential decision.
(2) Issues a simplified output, including a score, classification, or recommendation, in order to evaluate the subject or predict outcomes specific to the subject.

(p)

(r) “Protected characteristic” means a characteristic listed in subdivision (b) of Section 51 of the Civil Code.

(q)

(s) (1) “Substantial modification” means a new version, release, update, or other modification to a covered ADS that materially changes its uses or outputs.
(2) “Substantial modification” does not mean include a modification that results from fine tuning. fine-tuning.

(r)

(t) “Trade secret” has the same meaning as in Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code.

(s)

(u) The definitions of “disparate impact” and “disparate treatment” provided in subdivisions (i) and (j) are intended solely for purposes of internal compliance, risk assessment, and documentation required by this chapter. These definitions shall not be construed to modify or supersede any standard, burden of proof, or element of a claim under the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Section 51 of the Civil Code), the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq.), or any other applicable civil rights law.

22756.1.
 (a) (1) With respect to a covered ADS that was first deployed, or made available to potential deployers, before January 1, 2026, the developer of the covered ADS shall conduct an initial performance evaluation impact assessment on the covered ADS before January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter.
(2) With respect to a covered ADS that is first deployed or made available to potential deployers on or after January 1, 2026, the developer of the covered ADS shall conduct a performance evaluation an impact assessment on the covered ADS before initially deploying the covered ADS, or making the covered ADS available to potential deployers, and annually thereafter.
(b) In conducting a performance evaluation an impact assessment on a covered ADS, a developer shall do all of the following:
(1) Describe the purpose of the covered ADS.
(2) List and describe all developer-approved uses of the covered ADS.
(3) For each developer-approved use, evaluate the expected performance of the covered ADS and document all of the following:
(A) The expected accuracy and reliability of the covered ADS.

(B)Any reasonably foreseeable effects of fine tuning on the accuracy and reliability of the covered ADS.

(C)

(B) Whether any disparate treatment is intended to occur and, if so, all of the following:
(i) The conditions under which each category of disparate treatment is intended to occur.
(ii) Whether each category of disparate treatment is necessary for a the developer-approved use.
(iii) Whether any alternatives not involving disparate treatment were considered.

(D)Any reasonably foreseeable effects of fine tuning on disparate treatment.

(E)

(C) Whether any disparate impacts are reasonably likely to occur and, if so, all of the following:
(i) The conditions under which each category of disparate impact is reasonably likely to occur.
(ii) Whether each category of disparate impact is necessary for a the developer-approved use.
(iii) Whether any alternatives not involving disparate impacts were considered.

(F)Whether any measures have been taken by the developer to mitigate the risk of unanticipated disparate impacts resulting from the use of the covered ADS.

(G)With respect to a covered ADS that has been deployed, whether any unanticipated disparate impacts have been reported to the developer by a deployer, and whether the developer has taken any measures to mitigate those disparate impacts.

(H)Any reasonably foreseeable effects of fine tuning on disparate impacts.

(4) (A) Beginning January 1, 2030, contract with an independent third-party auditor to assess the developer’s compliance with this subdivision. subdivision and complete an audit within six months of the most recent impact assessment and two years after completion of the initial audit.
(B) (i) Except pursuant to clause (ii), a developer that contracts with an auditor pursuant to this paragraph shall provide the auditor with any available information that is reasonably necessary for the auditor to comprehensively assess developer compliance.
(ii) A developer that provides documentation to an auditor pursuant to this subparagraph may make reasonable redactions for the purpose of protecting trade secrets. To the extent that a developer withholds information, the developer shall notify the auditor and provide a basis for the withholding.
(C) If the deadline for conducting a performance evaluation pursuant to subdivision (a) an impact assessment or audit elapses before the impact assessment or audit has been completed, a developer shall not deploy the covered ADS or make the covered ADS available to potential deployers until the impact assessment or audit has been completed.
(D) A developer that receives feedback from an auditor pursuant to this paragraph shall do both of the following:
(i) Consider and attempt to incorporate that feedback into the development of any subsequent version of a covered ADS.
(ii) Make a high-level summary of the feedback publicly available at no cost to users of the developer’s internet website.
(c) (1)A developer that sells, licenses, or otherwise transfers a covered ADS to a potential deployer shall provide the deployer with all of the following:

(A)The

(1) A high-level summary of the results of the most recent performance evaluation impact assessment conducted on the covered ADS by the developer pursuant to this chapter.

(B)

(2) For each developer-approved use of the covered ADS, instructions explaining how the covered ADS should be used by the deployer to make or facilitate a consequential decision.

(C)

(3) For each developer-approved use of the covered ADS, a description of whether and under what circumstances the covered ADS can be fine-tuned.

(D)

(4) An explanation of the deployer’s responsibilities under this chapter, including a description of any circumstances under which the deployer would assume the responsibilities of a developer pursuant to subdivision (h) (f) of Section 22756.2.

(E)(i)

(5) (A) Any technical information necessary for the deployer to comply with this chapter.

(ii)

(B) A developer shall not be required to provide additional technical information to a deployer that has assumed the responsibilities of a developer pursuant to subdivision (h) (f) of Section 22756.2.

(2)(A)A developer that provides documentation to a potential deployer pursuant to this subdivision may make reasonable redactions for the purpose of protecting trade secrets.

(B)To the extent that a developer withholds information pursuant to subparagraph (A), the developer shall notify the deployer and provide a basis for the withholding.

(d)A developer that receives an impact assessment from an auditor of a deployed covered ADS pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 22756.3 shall provide all of the following information to any deployer of the covered ADS:

(1)Any material differences between the expected accuracy of the covered ADS and the observed accuracy of the covered ADS and the deployment conditions under which those differences are reasonably likely to occur.

(2)Any material differences between the expected reliability of the covered ADS and the observed reliability of the covered ADS and the deployment conditions under which those differences are reasonably likely to occur.

(3)Any unanticipated disparate impacts resulting from the use of the covered ADS and the deployment conditions under which those disparate impacts are reasonably likely to occur.

(4)An explanation of any steps the deployer can take to mitigate these discrepancies.

(e)A developer that receives feedback from an auditor pursuant to this chapter shall consider and attempt to incorporate that feedback into the development of any subsequent version of a covered ADS.

(f)

(d) A developer that provides documentation to a deployer pursuant to this section shall ensure the documentation is all of the following:
(1) Transmitted directly to the deployer or otherwise made available in a manner reasonably calculated to ensure the deployer receives the documentation.
(2) Provided in English and in any other language the developer regularly uses to communicate with deployers.
(3) Presented in a manner that ensures the communication clearly and effectively conveys the required information to the deployer.

(g)

(e) A developer that deploys a covered ADS or makes a covered ADS available to potential deployers shall maintain all of the following documentation in an unredacted format for as long as the developer deploys the covered ADS or makes the covered ADS available to potential deployers plus 10 five years:
(1) The results of any performance evaluations impact assessments conducted on the covered ADS pursuant to this chapter.
(2) Any documentation provided to deployers pursuant to this chapter.
(3) Any documentation provided to, or received from, auditors pursuant to this chapter.
(4) Records of any redactions made pursuant to this chapter.

(h)

(f) It is unlawful to advertise to consumers in the state that a covered ADS is capable of performing in a manner not substantiated by the results of the most recent performance evaluation impact assessment conducted on the covered ADS.

(i)

(g) (1) A developer that deploys a covered ADS or makes a covered ADS available to potential deployers shall designate at least one employee to oversee the developer’s compliance with this chapter.
(2) A developer shall require an employee designated pursuant to this subdivision to conduct a prompt and comprehensive review of any credible compliance issue raised to that employee.

(j)

(h) This section does not apply to a developer subject to the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 6801 et seq.) who uses with respect to a covered ADS that is intended to make or facilitate a consequential decision related to financial services, as described in paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of Section 22756.

22756.2.
 (a) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), before a deployer finalizes a consequential decision made or facilitated by a covered ADS, ADS used by the deployer, the deployer shall provide any subject of that decision with a plain language written disclosure containing all of the following information:
(A) A statement informing the subject that a covered ADS will be used to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(B) The name, version number, and developer of the covered ADS.
(C) Whether the deployer’s use of the covered ADS is within the scope of a developer-approved use and a description of that use.
(D) (i) The personal characteristics or attributes of the subject that the covered ADS measures or assesses to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(ii) The sources of personal information collected from the subject that will be used to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(iii) Any key parameters known to disproportionately affect the outcome of the consequential decision.
(E) The structure and format of the outputs of the covered ADS and a plain language description of how those outputs are will be used to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(F) Whether a natural person will review either of the following before the consequential decision is finalized:
(i) The outputs of the covered ADS.
(ii) The outcome of the consequential decision.
(G) The subject’s rights under subdivisions (b) and (d) subdivision (c) and the means and timeframe for exercising those rights.
(H) (i) Contact information for the deployer.
(ii) Contact information for the entity that manages the covered ADS, if that entity is not the deployer.
(iii) Contact information for the entity that will interpret the results of the covered ADS, if that entity is not the deployer.
(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply if the subject of the consequential decision is having a medical emergency.
(3) The disclosure made pursuant to this subdivision may be made through a generalized notice on the deployer’s internet website or by using an automatic reply mechanism.
(b) (1) After a deployer finalizes a consequential decision made or facilitated by a covered ADS, the deployer shall provide any subject of that decision with a plain language written disclosure containing all of the following information within five days:
(A) The personal characteristics or attributes of the subject that the covered ADS used measured or assessed to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(B) The sources of personal information collected from the subject that were used to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(C) Any key parameters that disproportionately affected the outcome of the consequential decision.
(D) The structure and format of the outputs of the covered ADS and a plain language description of how those outputs were used to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(E) The role that the ADS played in making the consequential decision and whether any human judgment was involved.
(F) Whether a natural person reviewed either of the following before the consequential decision was finalized:
(i) The outputs of the covered ADS.
(ii) The outcome of the consequential decision.

(F)

(G) Contact information for the deployer.

(G)

(H) Contact information for the entity that manages the covered ADS, if that entity is not the deployer.

(H)

(I) Contact information for the entity that will interpret the results of the covered ADS, if that entity is not the deployer.

(I)

(J) The subject’s rights under subdivision (d) (c) and the means and timeframe for exercising those rights.
(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply if the subject of the consequential decision is having a medical emergency. to either of the following:
(A) A medical emergency.
(B) The sorting by a covered ADS of résumés based on bona fide occupational qualifications.
(3) A deployer that provides documentation to a subject of a consequential decision pursuant to this subdivision shall ensure the documentation is all of the following:
(A) Transmitted directly to the subject.
(B) Provided in English and in any other language that the deployer regularly uses to communicate with subjects.
(C) Made available in formats that are accessible to people who are blind or have other disabilities.
(D) Presented in a manner that ensures the communication clearly and effectively conveys the required information to the subject.
(c) After a deployer finalizes a consequential decision made or facilitated by a covered ADS, the deployer shall provide any subject of that decision with an opportunity to do both of the following within 30 business days:
(1) (A) Correct any incorrect personal information used by the covered ADS to make or facilitate the consequential decision.
(B) A deployer shall comply with respond to a request to correct personal information within 30 business days of receiving the request if the request is accompanied by documentation sufficient to assess the basis for the request.
(C) (i) If a deployer determines that complying with a request to correct personal information would change the outcome of the consequential decision, the deployer shall, within 30 days of making the determination, rectify the decision. decision, if feasible.
(ii) If a deployer determines that complying with a request to correct personal information would not change the outcome of the consequential decision, the deployer shall, within 30 days of making the determination, inform the subject that the correction was made but that it did not alter the decision.
(D) A deployer that denies a request to correct personal information determines that rectifying the decision is infeasible shall do both of the following:
(i) Provide the subject with an explanation of the basis for the denial. determination.
(ii) Provide the subject with a reasonable opportunity to request that the deployer delete the subject’s personal information.
(2) (A) Appeal the outcome of the consequential decision.
(B) A deployer shall review a request to appeal a consequential decision within 30 business days of receiving the request if the request is accompanied by documentation sufficient to assess the basis for the request.
(C) (i) If a deployer determines that the original decision was incorrect, the deployer shall, within 30 days of making the determination, rectify the decision.
(ii) If a deployer determines that the original decision was correct, the deployer shall, within 30 days of making the determination, inform the subject that the consequential decision will not be altered.
(D) A deployer that denies a request to appeal the outcome of a consequential decision shall provide the subject with an explanation of the basis for the denial.
(d) (1) (A) A deployer that provides documentation to the subject of a consequential decision pursuant to this section may make reasonable redactions for the purpose of protecting trade secrets.
(B) To the extent that a deployer withholds information pursuant to paragraph (1), the deployer shall notify the subject and provide a basis for the withholding.
(2) A deployer that is required by another state or federal law to provide substantially similar notice to a subject of a consequential decision need not duplicatively provide notice to the subject under this section.
(e) A deployer’s collection, use, retention, and sharing of personal information from a subject of a consequential decision shall be reasonably necessary and proportionate to achieve the purposes for which the personal information was collected and processed, or for another disclosed purpose that is compatible with the context in which the personal information was collected, and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes.
(f) (1) A deployer that does any of the following assumes the responsibilities of a developer under this chapter:

(1)

(A) Uses a covered ADS to make or facilitate consequential decisions that directly impact more than 6,000 people in a given three-year period, if the deployer did not receive any documentation from the developer of the covered ADS pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 22756.1 during the three-year period.

(2)

(B) Uses a covered ADS to make or facilitate consequential decisions that directly impact more than 6,000 people in a given three-year period, if the deployer’s use of the covered ADS is outside the scope of a developer-approved use.

(3)

(C) Substantially modifies an automated decision system and does either of the following:

(A)

(i) Uses the substantially modified system to make or facilitate consequential decisions that directly impact more than 6,000 people in a given three-year period.

(B)

(ii) Makes the substantially modified system available to potential deployers.
(2) This subdivision does not apply to a deployer that is subject to the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 6801 et seq.) with respect to a covered ADS that is used to make or facilitate a consequential decision related to financial services, as described in paragraph (7) of subdivision (c) of Section 22756.
(g) A deployer that uses a covered ADS to make or facilitate a consequential decision shall retain the following documentation in an unredacted format for as long as the deployer uses the covered ADS plus 10 five years:
(1) Any documentation received from developers pursuant to this chapter.
(2) Any documentation provided pursuant to this section to subjects of consequential decisions made or facilitated by the covered ADS.
(3) Any requests to correct personal information made pursuant to this section.
(4) Any requests to appeal the outcome of a consequential decision made pursuant to this section.
(5) Any documentation provided to, or received from, auditors pursuant to this chapter.
(6) Records of any redactions made pursuant to this section.
(h) (1) A deployer that uses a covered ADS to make or facilitate a consequential decision shall designate at least one employee to oversee the deployer’s compliance with this chapter.
(2) A deployer shall require an employee designated pursuant to this subdivision to conduct a prompt and comprehensive review of any credible compliance issue related to the deployer’s use of a covered ADS that is raised to that employee.
(i) In addition to the requirements of this section, a deployer that is a business subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (Title 1.81.5 (commencing with Section 1798.100)) is subject to any privacy-related opt-out and access regulation duly adopted by the California Privacy Protection Agency pursuant to paragraph (15) of subdivision (a) of Section 1798.185 of, and subdivision (b) of Section 1798.199.40 of of, the Civil Code.
(j) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2027.

22756.3.
 (a) (1) Within 30 days of receiving a request from the Attorney General for a performance evaluation an impact assessment prepared pursuant to this chapter, a developer, deployer, or auditor of a covered ADS shall provide an unredacted copy of the performance evaluation impact assessment to the Attorney General.
(2) The Attorney General may share performance evaluations impact assessments with other enforcement entities as necessary for enforcement purposes.
(b) (1) The disclosure or sharing of a performance evaluation an impact assessment pursuant to subdivision (a) does not constitute a waiver of any attorney-client privilege, work-product protection, or trade secret protection that might otherwise exist with respect to any information contained in the performance evaluation. impact assessment.
(2) A performance evaluation An impact assessment disclosed or shared pursuant to subdivision (a) is exempt from the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code).
(c) Each day a covered ADS is used for which a performance evaluation an impact assessment has not been submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to this section is an additional violation of this section.

22756.4.
 (a) Any of the following public entities may bring a civil action against a developer, deployer, or auditor who violates this chapter:
(1) The Attorney General.
(2) A district attorney, county counsel of any county within which a city has a population in excess of 750,000, city attorney in a city and county, or city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000.
(3) A city prosecutor in any city having a full-time city prosecutor with the consent of the district attorney.
(4) The Civil Rights Department.
(5) The Labor Commissioner with respect to employment-related decisions only.
(b) A court may award a prevailing plaintiff who brings an action pursuant to subdivision (a) all of the following:
(1) Injunctive relief.
(2) Declaratory relief.
(3) Reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation costs.
(4) (A) A civil penalty of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation.
(B) In assessing the amount of the civil penalty pursuant to this paragraph, the court may consider relevant circumstances presented by the parties to the action, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(i) The nature and severity of the misconduct.
(ii) The number of violations.
(iii) The length of time over which the misconduct occurred and the persistence of the misconduct.
(iv) The willfulness of the misconduct.
(v) The defendant’s assets, liabilities, and net worth.
(c) A developer or deployer who contracts with a third party to perform the developer’s or deployer’s duties under this chapter, other than those duties related to auditing, is subject to liability under this chapter for the third party’s failure to perform those duties.

22756.5.
 (a) This chapter does not apply to an automated decision system the sole purpose of which is to do either any of the following:
(1) Detect, protect against, or respond to cybersecurity incidents or preserve the integrity or security of computer systems.
(2) Operate aircraft in the national airspace.
(3) Serve a national security or military purpose, if the covered ADS is made available exclusively to a federal government agency for that purpose.
(4) Detect, protect against, or respond to suspected or actual fraudulent electronic payment transactions.
(5) Advertisements.
(6) Detect, protect against, or respond to physical security incidents or illegal activity that threatens the physical safety of natural persons.
(b) The use of a consumer credit score to inform a consequential decision does not itself create an obligation under this chapter.
(c) This chapter does not apply to a covered ADS to the extent that its regulation is preempted by federal law.

22756.6.
 (a) The rights, remedies, and penalties established by this chapter are cumulative and shall not be construed to supersede the rights, remedies, or penalties established under other laws, including, but not limited to, Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 12940) of Part 2.8 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code and Section 51 of the Civil Code.
(b) This chapter does not diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies of an employee under any other federal or state law or under any employment contract or collective bargaining agreement.
(c) This chapter does not authorize any use of automated decision systems that is limited, restricted, or prohibited under any other applicable law.
(d) This chapter does not authorize disparate impacts or disparate treatment limited, restricted, or prohibited under any other applicable law.

SEC. 2.

 Section 51 of the Civil Code, as amended by Section 2.5 of Chapter 779 of the Statutes of 2024, is amended to read:

51.
 (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the Unruh Civil Rights Act.
(b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever.
(c) This section shall not be construed to confer any right or privilege on a person that is conditioned or limited by law or that is applicable alike to persons of every sex, color, race, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, or to persons regardless of their genetic information.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require any construction, alteration, repair, structural or otherwise, or modification of any sort whatsoever, beyond that construction, alteration, repair, or modification that is otherwise required by other provisions of law, to any new or existing establishment, facility, building, improvement, or any other structure, nor shall anything in this section be construed to augment, restrict, or alter in any way the authority of the State Architect to require construction, alteration, repair, or modifications that the State Architect otherwise possesses pursuant to other laws.
(e) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Disability” means any mental or physical disability as defined in Sections 12926 and 12926.1 of the Government Code.
(2) (A) “Genetic information” means, with respect to any individual, information about any of the following:
(i) The individual’s genetic tests.
(ii) The genetic tests of family members of the individual.
(iii) The manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of the individual.
(B) “Genetic information” includes any request for, or receipt of, genetic services, or participation in clinical research that includes genetic services, by an individual or any family member of the individual.
(C) “Genetic information” does not include information about the sex or age of any individual.
(3) “Medical condition” has the same meaning as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 12926 of the Government Code.
(4) “Race” is inclusive of traits associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles. “Protective hairstyles” includes, but is not limited to, such hairstyles as braids, locs, and twists.
(5) “Religion” includes all aspects of religious belief, observance, and practice.
(6) “Sex” includes, but is not limited to, pregnancy, childbirth, or medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth. “Sex” also includes, but is not limited to, a person’s gender. “Gender” means sex, and includes a person’s gender identity and gender expression. “Gender expression” means a person’s gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person’s assigned sex at birth.
(7) “Sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status” includes any of the following:
(A) Any combination of those characteristics.
(B) A perception that the person has any particular characteristic or characteristics within the listed categories or any combination of those characteristics.
(C) A perception that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have, any particular characteristic or characteristics, or any combination of characteristics, within the listed categories.
(8) “Sexual orientation” has the same meaning as defined in subdivision (s) of Section 12926 of the Government Code.
(f) A violation of the right of any individual under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) shall also constitute a violation of this section.
(g) Verification of immigration status and any discrimination based upon verified immigration status, where required by federal law, shall not constitute a violation of this section.
(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the provision of services or documents in a language other than English, beyond that which is otherwise required by other provisions of federal, state, or local law, including Section 1632.
(i) In an action alleging a violation of this section in which the defendant’s development, modification, or use of an automated decision system, as defined in Section 22756 of the Business and Professions Code, is alleged to have caused or facilitated the violation, the extent to which the defendant complied with Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code is relevant to, but not conclusive of, whether the defendant violated this section, and a failure to comply with Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code shall not, by itself, give rise to a presumption of unlawful intent.

SEC. 3.

 Article 3 (commencing with Section 12959) is added to Chapter 6 of Part 2.8 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read:
Article  3. Automated Decision Systems

12959.
 In an action alleging a violation of this chapter in which the defendant’s development, modification, or use of an automated decision system, as defined in Section 22756 of the Business and Professions Code, is alleged to have caused or facilitated the violation, the extent to which the defendant complied with Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code is relevant to, but not conclusive of, whether the defendant violated this chapter.

SEC. 4.

 The Legislature finds and declares that Section 1 of this act, which adds Chapter 24.6 (commencing with Section 22756) to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, imposes a limitation on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
In order to protect proprietary information, it is necessary that trade secrets disclosed in performance evaluations and impact assessments to agencies and departments pursuant to Section 1 of this act remain confidential.
Back to Tracker